Last week, I invited you to reflect on a key question in building your Investment Policy Statement (IPS) and, ultimately, growing your wealth: What is your investment philosophy when it comes to the nature of financial markets? Did you have a chance to think it over? I’d love to hear your thoughts! And if you have any questions, don’t hesitate to reach out. As for me, I consider myself a "passive investor." In practice, this means I focus on low-cost index funds and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) as the cornerstone of my portfolio. It wasn’t always this way. Early in my career, I was a firm believer in "active management." So, what changed my mind? My decision-making process is grounded in research and a careful analysis of empirical evidence. One of the most compelling pieces of evidence I rely on is the SPIVA Scorecard, published annually for the past 20 years. Compiled by S&P Dow Jones Indices, the SPIVA Scorecard compares the performance of actively managed funds to their benchmarks. When a fund outperforms its benchmark (after fees), it’s considered to have "outperformed," meaning it’s adding value. If a fund underperforms its benchmark (after fees), it’s "underperforming," and investors are potentially leaving money on the table. Let’s dive into the latest available SPIVA statistics: UNITED STATES In the last fifteen years 88% of equity actively managed mutual funds UNDERPERFORMED their benchmark (hint: they did not obtain their goal, hence you would have left money on the table if invested in them!) EUROPE In the last ten years 92% of equity actively managed mutual funds UNDERPERFORMED their benchmark (hint: they did not obtain their goal, hence you would have left money on the table if invested in them!) CANADA In the last ten years 96.6% of equity actively managed mutual funds UNDERPERFORMED their benchmark (hint: they did not obtain their goal, hence you would have left money on the table if invested in them!) SOUTH AFRICA In the last ten years 71% of equity actively managed mutual funds UNDERPERFORMED their benchmark (hint: they did not obtain their goal, hence you would have left money on the table if invested in them!) AUSTRALIA In the last fifteen years 85% of equity actively managed mutual funds UNDERPERFORMED their benchmark (hint: they did not obtain their goal, hence you would have left money on the table if invested in them!) Are you curious about other countries? Shoot me a reply with your question! Did I convince one way or another? Would love to know :) |