Why Russians record video appeals to Putin?

Архив рассылок
header_focus

Hello!

 I'm Maxim Polyakov, a correspondent for the online magazine “7x7”. Several residents of Rypushkalitsy village in Karelia recorded a video appeal addressed to Vladimir Putin. In the video, they expressed their frustration with local authorities, who have been unable to restore the water supply for over 20 years. Until recently, the villagers used water from the river, but due to recent waste dumping, it has become undrinkable. The locals hope that Putin will see their appeal on December 14, the day he conducts his traditional live Q&A session on TV known as the ‘Direct Line.’ This live broadcast allows the President to respond directly to citizens' questions. In this newsletter, I'll share the background and evolution of Putin's ‘Direct Line’ over the past 20 years and reveal what happened to the residents of Rypushkalitsy in the end.

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes

Subscribe

Key facts

The TV program has a pretty straightforward name – ‘Direct Line with Vladimir Putin.’ During the broadcast, the President responds to questions from Russian citizens. There is little doubt among experts that Putin is aware of the questions in advance, and his assistants prepare answers for him.

  • The inaugural ‘Direct Line’ with Putin took place on December 24, 2001. Since then, it has been an annual event, with exceptions in 2004, 2012, 2020, and 2022. In total, Putin has conducted 17 such sessions: 13 as the President of Russia and 4 as the Prime Minister. In 2023, the ‘Direct Line’ was merged with the President's extensive press conference.
  • Questions to Putin can be posed through various channels. Firstly, you can record a video, as demonstrated by the residents of Rypushkalitsy. Secondly, questions can be submitted through a dedicated website. Thirdly, some individuals are invited to the studio to ask their questions in person. Additionally, the organizers include direct connections from different parts of Russia. Participants in these segments are carefully selected, and the wording of their questions is suggested by the program's editors.
  • During the first ‘Direct Line,’ Putin received less than 400,000 questions, but in 2015, the number exceeded 3.25 million. Over 20 years, Putin has addressed more than 1,200 questions in live broadcasts.
  • In 2001, Putin engaged with Russians for 2 hours and 20 minutes. In 2013, he set a record, with the ‘Direct Line' lasting 4 hours and 47 minutes. If we tally up all the Direct Lines, Putin has spent a total of 61 hours in live broadcasts – equivalent to two and a half days.

My personal observations

I was born and raised in Vorkuta, a small town of coal miners in the north of Russia, and I witnessed two instances of locals reaching out to Putin.

The first time was in 2005, when I finished my third year at the university. I recall the excitement when the news spread that journalists were coming to our town with their expensive equipment to allow people to ask questions. Vorkuta buzzed with rumors.

Firstly, people discussed the questions they would personally ask. Some were quite direct and even harsh in their wording. However, the majority believed that such questions would simply not be permitted. Secondly, while nobody knew who would be selected for the live broadcast, many held hopes of being chosen.

The reality turned out to be much different from our expectations.

A few days before the ‘Direct Line’, Moscow journalists arrived in Vorkuta, selected a few potentially interesting questions, which were eventually approved by the Kremlin.

Then, the journalists chose people for the extras and three individuals to ask questions. They were invited to the town center, where the broadcast setup was already in place.

Only vetted individuals were allowed into this area. The police prevented local human rights activists, who attempted to break into the broadcast, from entering.

An hour before the live event, the journalists revealed the questions approved by the Kremlin. Eventually, Vorkuta residents asked about the development of the coal mining industry, financial support for relocation from the north of Russia to its central part, and the possible closure of the only institute in the town. Putin responded assertively, stating that the government would support the miners, provide financial aid to migrants, and the institute would remain open. Indeed, it continued operating for more than 10 years after that.

When I watched the live broadcast from Vorkuta on TV, two thoughts occupied my mind throughout. Firstly, the issues highlighted by the locals were not the most critical for the town. Secondly, both the questions from Vorkuta's residents and Putin's responses lacked vitality; it seemed like everyone involved was playing a role, and the acting was subpar.

I began paying closer attention to the ‘Direct Line' a few years ago when my sister sent a written message to Putin several days before the broadcast. She complained about the road in front of our house remaining uncleared from snow for weeks. As expected, her question didn't make it to the broadcast, but the outcomes of her actions were surprisingly swift.

The vicinity of our house was cleared of snow the next day, and my sister received a call from a high-ranking official from the mayor's office. At first, the official was extremely polite, and my sister explained her position to him. After hearing her out, however, the man adopted an offended tone, exclaiming, "But why on Earth did you complain directly to the President? Why didn't you contact us? Do you know what kind of trouble we found ourselves in yesterday?"

My sister politely explained that she had been bringing attention to the issue for several days, both orally and in writing, but none of the officials had responded. It took her complaint to Putin to spur any action.

At that moment, my sister realized that in Russia, almost no political institution works except for the presidency. Even for a seemingly simple problem like clearing snow, one needs to complain to the President to be heard.

Water for the Rypushkalitsy residents

At the beginning of this newsletter, I told you about the villagers from Karelia who recorded a video appeal for Putin. The end of their story was as unexpected to them as it was predictable to me.

As soon as the local activist Tatiana Antonova wrote a post on social media, inviting the locals to participate in the video recording, the police came to her house. They asked what kind of ‘assembly’ the woman was planning and what would be written on the posters. The policemen claimed that somebody made a complaint about Antonova’s actions, but refused to show it. Though they clearly expected that the activist would abandon the idea of reaching out to Putin, the woman recorded a video regardless.

We should hardly expect to see this video on TV on December 14. However, there is a chance that the officials will handle the water supply problem the same way they solved the problem with the uncleared snow in Vorkuta. 

Donate

Focus is a short summary of the main articles published by '7x7' over the past week and my personal take on them. By reading this newsletter, you'll get a unique insight into the prevailing trends in Russian society today.

Subscribe to Focus and tell your friends and family about it!

© Copyright, online journal "7х7"

Unsubscribe

Отправлено через

SendPulse