PANDA Insights: 5 April 2024

Newsletter Archive
PANDA | Insights

video_preview_f00f0632470017b59ca62d9186497edb.jpg

The UK Government’s use of behavioural science strategies in their Covid messaging

Dr Gary Sidley shares his research findings on the specifics of who, what and how behavioural science (nudge) was used by the UK Government to manipulate the public into compliance with the draconian Covid interventions.

Dr Sidley discusses:
1. Scale of tax-funded behavioural scientists employment in the UK Government.
2. The civil servants, government ministers, advertising agency and behavioural scientists responsible for the ‘Look Them in The Eyes’ ad campaign.
3. The degree of responsibility the psychological/behavioural specialists in UK Government carry for the strategic deployment of fear, shame and scapegoating of UK citizens.
4. The Cabinet Office’s official justifications for the ad campaign.
5. Surprising lack of ethical considerations in the development of the ad campaign.


garysidley

Fear, shame and peer pressure to promote compliance with Covid-19 restrictions

by Dr Gary Sidley

The behavioural science infused in UK Government communication during the Covid event produced nudges which translated into fear inflation, shaming and scapegoating.

Who were responsible for the communications?

Read the article

Right off the bat, they were lying

by Thomas Verduyn

"What people believe to be known knowns about Covid origins may actually be unknown (or unknowable) unknowns. This article suggests revisiting fundamental questions and (humbly and openly) starting again from first principles....." ~ Prof Martin Neil

Read the article
bat
grenda

Public Health and Natural Rights: A Tale of Two Cities

by Christopher S. Grenda

"Far too many microphoned voices seem intent on revoking our equal moral status. They seek to belittle and reduce us through their sophistic contortions of public-health and social-science nomenclature. It’s simply a matter of will, to deny our standing, to coerce our submission, to diminish our sense of ourselves."

Read the guest editorial

Centralisation always fails

by Nick Hudson

South Africans will start hearing about Value-Based Medicine. Pay attention when you do. This is the next step in the implementation of inferior centralised medicine, brought to you by the same people who pushed lockdowns and vaccine mandates. It's supposedly based on rational cost-benefit analysis. But remember that lockdowns and vaccine mandates both failed massively on any sensible cost-benefit analysis, so you need to read this as putting lipstick on a pig.

The pig is socialist, centralized medicine. Most of the country's hospital doctors have already been introduced to the concept. Many are shrugging, and taking the view that this is simply another iteration of changes in the way they are paid by medical aids, and nothing to be alarmed about. But this is the same apathy that caused them to go along to get along when the depravities of the Covid policy response came their way. They now need to demonstrate some spine and get organised against this.

Tag lines such as "a bad system is better than a good specialist" will accompany this offence against independence and the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship. Such codswallop is fashionable among the fools who believe that good clinical medicine can be implemented by algorithmic protocols dusted with the woo-woo of "AI".

If you need a refresher on why centralisation always fails, read the thread below

Read the thread

Consider supporting our work as we deepen our inquiry into the drivers, events and effects of the Covid era.

Donate now

pandata.org

Media Enquiries: media@pandata.org

© Copyright, 2024, Panda Knowledge Factory NPC • Cape Town, South Africa. This email has been sent to you, because you are part of our trusted network. Unsubscribe

Sent via

SendPulse